JUDGMENT :

PARTH PRATEEM SAHU, J.

1. Petitioner aggrieved by the order dated 05.02.2009 whereby the period from 11.12.2002 to 13.02.2005 (794 days) has been declared to be dies-non on account of unauthorised absence from service has filed this writ petition with the following reliefs:

“10.1 That, the impugned order dated 05.02.2009 deserves to be set-aside and quash on the ground as narrated supra.

10.2 That the respondents may be directed to pay salary to the petitioner for 794 days alongwith other service benefits as per the petitioner entitlement.

10.3 That as the petitioner was treated diaznon for the period of 794 days, his seniority may be maintained and regularized. Other benefits in relating the seniority may be afforded to him.

10.4 That, the leave, which is left with the petitioner, details of which have been stated above may kindly be adjusted against the leave period of 794 days and accordingly the impugned order may be set-aside.

10.5 Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper, may also be passed in favour of the petitioner together with cost of the petition.”

2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner was appointed as Ayurvedic doctor on