Back
SUREPALLI NANDA
B. Venkanna – Appellant
Versus
Commandant 217 – Respondent
ORDER :
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel for the respondents.
2. The petitioner approached this Court seeking relief as follows:
3. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is as follows:
a) The petitioner was appointed in CRPF on 04.12.2005 and on transfer from 74 Bn, CRPF, the petitioner was posted to 217 Bn, CRPF w.e.f 02.09.2012.
b) The petitioner was absent from his duties from 10.06.2013 without any information to the 1st respondent. After framing charges and conducting of ex-parte enquiry the petitioner was removed from service by order dated 29.10.2014. Aga
The right to receive the enquiry report and a second show-cause notice is a fundamental aspect of the principles of natural justice in disciplinary proceedings, and failure to provide these rights in....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
