Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
Hnunpuii (Ms) – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Corporation of Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of unauthorized construction lawsuit. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. response from the respondent based on mcd's statement. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. application for stay based on identical issues. (Para 6 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. analysis of causes of action in different suits. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. interpretation of section 10 of the cpc. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. distinct nature of the suits and issues. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 7. possibility of suit consolidation. (Para 18) |
| 8. rejection of stay application. (Para 19) |
| 9. principles of natural justice in property demolition. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 10. conclusion of the judgment. (Para 24) |
1. Ms. Hnunpuii resides in Flat No. B-503, S. B. Apartments, situated opposite Tivoli Garden, Chattarpur, New Delhi-110074 ("the suit property", hereinafter). Mr. Rajender Ambawat ("Ambawat" hereinafter), owns Shop No. 1 on the ground floor of the same apartment block.
2. Alleging that Ambawat was raising illegal and unauthorized construction on the seventh and eighth floors of the suit property, Hnunpuii instituted CS SCJ 165/2020 against Ambawat, also impleading the Deputy Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) and the SHO
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
