Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Vishal Verma – Appellant
Versus
Twinkle Vinayak – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's request for overnight custody. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. change in circumstances regarding child's age. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. arguments concerning visitation rights. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. welfare of the child as paramount consideration. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. court's decision on petition dismissal and procedure. (Para 10 , 11) |
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)--The present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 22nd January, 2021 whereby the petitioner had sought overnight custody of Master Kiaan for two nights every weekend.
2. The request of the petitioner-father was rejected by the learned Family Court, Judge taking into account Section 6(a) of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 as well as the young age of the child. The Court also took into account the situation of Covid-19 existing at that time. However, the learned Family Court Judge made an interim arrangement whereby the petitioner-father was allowed to have physical custody of the child from 10:00 Am to 6:00 PM on first and third Sunday of every month with effect from February, 2021.
3. Being aggrieved of this, the petitioner filed the present petition assailing the impugned order. Howev
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
