SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Amit Kaushik – Appellant
Versus
Kavita – Respondent


Table of Content
1. interim custody orders are issued based on the child's welfare. (Para 1)
2. petitioner argues for modification due to child's age and mother's inaction. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. consideration of the child's best interest can lead to order modification. (Para 7 , 8)
4. petition disposed; prior visitation order continues temporarily. (Para 9 , 10)

JUDGMENT

Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)--The present petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 17th January, 2012, whereby the following directions were issued:

    "30. For the reasons recorded above, this application is allowed. The respondent is directed to hand over interim custody of the minor child to the petitioner. The order dated 24.9.11 directing visitation is no longer continued. However, this order be subject to the following conditions:

    (a) The petitioner shall produce the minor child in court for visitation of the respondent on the first, third and fourth Saturday and every second Monday of the month between 2.00PM to 5.00PM till further orders,

    (b) Since the minor child is 3 years old the petitioner shall take all necessary measures to ensure the education of the child by getting him admitted

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top