SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
Mahashian Di Hatti Pvt. Limited – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax – Respondent


Table of Content
1. challenging notices issued under income tax act. (Para 1)
2. allegations made without supporting evidence. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
3. requirement for specific material in notices. (Para 6 , 7)
4. set aside vague notices and directions for specifics. (Para 8)
5. rights of parties are left open; merits not commented. (Para 9 , 10)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)

C.M.No. 37751/2022

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) No.12505/2022 & C.M.No.37750/2022

1. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the notice dated 18th May, 2022 issued under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (`the Act') and the order passed under Section 148A(d) of the Act and the notice issued under Section 148 of the Act dated 22nd July, 2022 for the Assessment Year 2014-15.

2. Learned senior counsel for the Petitioner states that the Respondent failed to comply with the direction of the Supreme Court in the case of Union of India vs. Ashish Agarwal, 2022 SCC OnLine SC 543 inasmuch as it made far-fetched allegations without any supporting evidence.

3. He points out that in the show cause notice issued under Section 1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top