Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Surender Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Archaeological Survey of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of appellant's father's employment and death. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. appellant's applications for compassionate appointment. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. legal standards for compassionate employment. (Para 5) |
| 4. court's observations on delay in seeking appointment. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 5. dismissal of the appeal. (Para 8) |
JUDGMENT
Satish Chandra Sharma, C.J. The present Letters Patent Appeal is arising out of order dated 16.08.2021 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C.) No. 7547/2021 dismissing the claim of the appellant herein for grant of compassionate appointment.
2. The undisputed facts of the case reveal that the father of the appellant was working as Garden Attendant in the services of the Archeological Survey of India (ASI) w.e.f. 1974, and unfortunately, the father of the appellant expired on 28.08.2009 leaving behind the appellant, appellant's mother and the appellant's three brothers. At the time of death of the father of the appellant, the family has received Rs.3,96,723/- towards terminal dues which included Gratuity, G.P.F., Insurance amount. At the relevant time, the appellant's mother was granted family pension of Rs.15,260/-.
3. It has been stated by the appella
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
