SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Central Board of Trustees, Employees Provident Fund Organisation, Delhi – Appellant
Versus
LRS KI Joint Venture – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petition challenges order from cgit. (Para 1)
2. petitioner argues against the tribunal's ruling. (Para 2)
3. court affirms validity of tribunal's findings. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
4. petition dismissed. (Para 6)

JUDGMENT

Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)

CM APPL.39861/2022 (exemption)

Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.

W.P.(C) 13155/2022 & CM APPL.39860/2022 (stay)

1. Present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 21.03.2022 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, CGIT cum Labour Court - II, Rouse Avenue, District Court Complex, Delhi in ATA No.109(4) 2015. Vide the impugned order, the learned CGIT had allowed the appeal filed by the respondent/management.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has appeared through video conferencing and submitted that since there was a delay in the deposit of the contribution, the APFC has rightly levied the damage of Rs.65,546/- and interest of Rs.33,381/-. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the learned CGIT has fallen into an error by allowing the appeal of the respondent/management.

3. The jurisdiction of the writ Court is crystal clear. Though the jurisdiction is wide

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top