SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV NARULA
Rajiv Khosla – Appellant
Versus
Delhi High Court Bar Association – Respondent


Table of Content
1. prerequisites for eligibility as a voter. (Para 1 , 3)
2. petitioners argue for enforcement of voting rights. (Para 4 , 5)
3. process of verifying voter eligibility. (Para 6 , 10 , 11)
4. importance of adhering to cut-off dates for voting. (Para 12 , 16)
5. interpretation of voting eligibility rules. (Para 20 , 22 , 26)
6. court's dismissal of petitions. (Para 28 , 29)

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Narula, J. (Oral)--In the backdrop of forthcoming elections for the Executive Committee of the Delhi High Court Bar Association ["DHCBA"] scheduled for 29th September 2022, Petitioners in W.P. (C) No. 13027/2022 (Mr. S.C. Malhotra) and W.P. (C) No. 13030/2022 (Mr. Ashutosh Kumar Singh), who are members of the DHCBA, are aggrieved with deletion of their names from the list of eligible voters. They seek time to pay their outstanding dues in terms of rules/resolutions/guidelines/constitution of the DHCBA, and to be included in the electoral roll. Petitioner in W.P. (C) No. 8197/2022 (Mr. Rajiv Khosla) is seeking implementation and strict compliance of the judgment dated 31st May, 2016 and order dated 18th October, 2016, both in W.P.(C) 8106/2010 titled P.K. Dash, Advocate & Ors. v. Bar Coun

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top