Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
T.D. Makhija – Appellant
Versus
Union Bank of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 8 , 9) |
| 2. arguments presented by the petitioner. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 3. court's analysis on evidence and procedure. (Para 24 , 26 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 36 , 40) |
| 4. legal principles guiding punishment review. (Para 28 , 29 , 34 , 35) |
| 5. final judgment and dismissal of the petition. (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
JUDGMENT
Chandra Dhari Singh, J. The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed by the Petitioner seeking quashing of the dismissal order dated 24th March 2001 passed by the Disciplinary Authority, Union Bank of India, and restoration of the services of the Petitioner with all benefits and full back-wages from 10th August 1999 by setting aside the suspension order dated 10th August 1999.
FACTUAL MATRIX
2. The Petitioner had joined the Respondent Bank in the year 1972. He appeared as an internal candidate for recruitment to the post of Officer Grade-I in the Respondent Bank in the year 1977. The Petitioner qualified the said examination based on the written test and he was promoted to Officers Grade-I in December 1977.
3. T
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
