DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
Uppal Chadha Hi-Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd. (After Merger of Scilla Town Planners Pvt. Ltd.) – Appellant
Versus
Income Tax Officer – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, J. (Oral)
C.M.No.40737/2022 (exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) No.13404/2022 & C.M.No.40705/2022
1. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the show cause notice dated 26th May, 2022 issued under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [`the Act'] as well as the order passed under Section 148A(d) of the Act and the notice issued under Section 148 of the Act both dated 30th May, 2022 for the Assessment Year 2013-14.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned order and notice are void ab initio as they have been issued in the name of "Scilla Town Planners Pvt. Ltd." [`STPPL'], a non-existent entity as it had merged with the Petitioner-company vide order dated 5th May, 2014 of this Court with the appointed date of merger being 1st April, 2014.
3. He states that pursuant to the directions of the Supreme Court in Union of India v. Ashish Agarwal, 2022 SCC OnLine SC 543, the Petitioner was issued a letter dated 26th May, 2022 under Section 148A(b) of the Act alleging that STPPL had advanced a sum of Rs.15 Crore to M/s Wave One Pvt. Ltd. despite there bein
Notices issued under Income Tax Act to a non-existent entity due to merger are void ab initio; reasoned orders are necessary for valid assessment proceedings.
Reassessment proceedings are invalid if initiated against a non-existent entity and without considering the taxpayer's response, breaching principles of natural justice.
A notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act is invalid if issued against a non-existent entity, confirming the need for valid recognition of a company's status post-amalgamation.
The failure to share material information in tax proceedings leads to a violation of the right to a fair hearing, necessitating the quashing of related orders.
Notices issued under the Income Tax Act to non-existent entities due to amalgamation are void ab initio and unenforceable.
Second notice under Section 148A(b) is invalid when an initial notice under Section 148 has already been served; Supreme Court directions pertain to a different timeframe and do not apply.
Reassessing without a hearing contravenes natural justice principles; proceedings must ensure opportunities for taxpayer representation.
The Court affirmed that vague show cause notices issued under Section 148A(b) lack compliance with natural justice, necessitating clear material for Assessee responses.
Assessing Officers must provide specific details in notices for effective response by Assessee, adhering to principles of natural justice.
Notices issued under tax laws must be addressed to the correct legal entity, and procedural errors may invalidate such notices, requiring rectification in accordance with legal standards.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.