SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SHAKDHER, TARA VITASTA GANJU
Lotus Pay Solutions Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. challenge to rbi's 2020 guidelines (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. background of petitioners and their claims (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. arguments for the petitioners' claims (Para 10 , 11)
4. counterarguments from rbi (Para 12 , 14 , 15)
5. court's analysis of definitions and legal powers (Para 16 , 17 , 18)
6. conclusive statements on the public interest (Para 19 , 20 , 21)
7. final ruling of the court (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25)

JUDGMENT

[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]

Rajiv Shakdher, J.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

    Preface

    Background

    Submissions of the petitioners

    Submissions of the respondent no.2/RBI

    Analysis and reasons

    Conclusion

Preface:

1. This writ petition seeks to assail three clauses of the circular dated 17.03.2020 issued by respondent no.2 i.e., the Reserve Bank of India [hereafter referred to as "RBI"], titled "Guidelines on Regulation of Payment Aggregators and Payment Gateways"[hereafter referred to as "the 2020 Guidelines"].

1.1. The three clauses, to which, challenge is laid by the petitioners are Clause 3, Clause 4 and Clause 8.

2. Briefly, Clause 3mandates,that insofar as non-banking entities which offer payment aggregation services are concern

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top