SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
Zelos Developers Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax – Respondent


Table of Content
1. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)--Present writ petition has been filed challenging the order passed under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (`the Act') as well as the consequential notice issued under Section 148 of the Act, both dated 30th July, 2022, for the Assessment Year 2016-17.

2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that reassessment was done on the allegation that sale of immovable property worth Rs.13,65,00,000/had escaped assessment. He states that the basis of the allegations are that the purchaser's PAN and Sale deeds were not on record as well as the stamp duty valuation of the transaction was not on record.

3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the allegations against the Petitioner are factually incorrect. He states that the Petitioner/seller as well as the Purchaser i.e. Sh. Narinder Singh Dhingra have valid PANs and the same were also on record, inter alia, in the form of the Annual Tax Statement under Section 203AA in Form 26AS. He states that income tax return for the Assessment Year 2016-17 has been filed on 17th October, 2016 where "Revenue from Operations" have been declared unde

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top