SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
Vijay Garg – Appellant
Versus
Income Tax Officer – Respondent


Table of Content
1. factual background of the case (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. procedural developments post-assessment (Para 4 , 5)
3. petitioner’s argument on validity of notice (Para 6)
4. interpretation of section 159 regarding deceased assessee (Para 8)
5. distinction based on timing of initial notice (Para 9)
6. final ruling and clarification on issues (Para 10 , 11)

JUDGMENT

Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, J. (Oral)

CM APPL. 42283/2022

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Accordingly, this application is disposed of.

W.P.(C) 13821/2022 & CM APPL. 42282/2022(for interim stay)

1. The present writ petition has been filed by Sh. Amit Garg, being the legal heir of the deceased assessee Smt. Vijaya Garg, seeking quashing of the impugned notice dated 1st June, 2022, furnishing material and information as per Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, (the `Act'), and consequent order dated 28th July, 2022, passed under Section 148A(d) of the Act, and notice dated 29th July, 2022, under Section 148 of the Act for the assessment year 2015-16.

2. Briefly stated the facts giving rise to the present controversy are that the deceased assessee filed her Return of Income on 28th September,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top