SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, JJ.
Hero Fincorp Limited - Appellant
Versus
National Faceless Assessment Centre Delhi - Respondent
W.P.(C) 5351 of 2021
Decided On : 06-10-2022




The failure to provide a draft assessment order and show cause notice under Section 144B violates the assessee's rights, necessitating annulment of the assessment order.

Headnote:(A) Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 143(3), 144B, 156, 274, and 270A - Assessment order challenged for not adhering to procedural requirements mandated under Section 144B - Substantial tax and interest demand raised without serving a draft assessment order or show cause notice. (Paras 1, 2, 5, 6)

(B) Legal principle of natural justice - The requirement to provide an opportunity to the assessee to respond before making prejudicial variations to income is a fundamental right. (Paras 5, 6)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner challenged an assessment order raising a tax demand of ₹86,62,88,770/- due to the failure to serve the mandatory draft assessment order and show cause notice as required by law.

Findings of Court:
The court found the absence of a notice and proper opportunity for response violated statutory rights, necessitating the assessment order's annulment.

Issues: The main questions involved were whether the petitioner was deprived of their statutory right to respond before the prejudice was imposed.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the failure to provide a show cause notice and draft order was a violation of due process under the Income Tax Act.

Result: Assessment order and notices set aside, with the matter remanded for fresh proceedings.

Table of Content
1. challenging assessment order and tax demand. (Para 1 , 2)
2. stay on operation of impugned orders. (Para 3)
3. failure to provide statutory notice prejudicial to assessee. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
4. setting aside the assessment order and remand. (Para 7)
5. disposal of writ petition without merits opinion. (Para 8 , 9)

JUDGMENT

Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, J. (Oral)--The present writ petition has been filed challenging the assessment order dated 30th April, 2021 and the consequential notices issued under Section 156 and Section 274 read with Section 270A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (`the Act').

2. It was stated in the petition that assessment order was passed under Section 143(3) read with Section 144B of the Act, raising a substantial tax and interest demand of Rs.86,62,88,770/-, without serving the petitioner with the mandatory draft assessment order along with show cause notice, as contemplated in Section 144B of the Act, although, the petitioner's declared income was varied to its prejudice.

3. Notice was issued in the present writ petition on 18th May, 2021 and the counsel for the respondent had sought time to take instructions in the present matter. In the meantime, the operation of the impugned orders was stayed.

4. Today, the learned counsel for the respondent states that he has received instructions in the matter to the effect that the impugned orders may be set aside and the matter may be remanded to the Assessing Officer (`AO') for determining the matter afresh.

5. For framing assessment under Section 143(3) of the Act, in terms of Section 144B(1)(xvi)(b) of the Act (as it stood prior to the amendment brought into effect by the Finance Act, 2022), the National Faceless Assessment Centre (`NaFAC') before making a variation to the income which is prejudicial to the assessee, was mandated to provide an opportunity to the assessee to show cause as to why the proposed variation should not be made and such a notice should be accompanied with the draft assessment order, proposed to be passed.

6. In the present case, admittedly, no show cause notice, as contemplated under Section 144B(1)(xvi)(b) of the Act was served on the petitioner, thereby depriving the petitioner of its statutory right to file a response as well as place the documents on record in support of its response and to be heard before passing of the final assessment order.

7. We therefore, set aside the assessment order dated 30th April, 2021 and the consequential notices issued under Section 156 and Section 274 read with Section 270A of the Act and remand the matter to the respondent No. 1 to complete the assessment proceedings within a period of twelve weeks from today, in accordance with law.

8. We make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the controversy in the writ petition.

9. With the above directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top