IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, JJ.
Hero Fincorp Limited - Appellant
Versus
National Faceless Assessment Centre Delhi - Respondent
W.P.(C) 5351 of 2021
Decided On : 06-10-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenging assessment order and tax demand. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. stay on operation of impugned orders. (Para 3) |
| 3. failure to provide statutory notice prejudicial to assessee. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. setting aside the assessment order and remand. (Para 7) |
| 5. disposal of writ petition without merits opinion. (Para 8 , 9) |
JUDGMENT
Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, J. (Oral)--The present writ petition has been filed challenging the assessment order dated 30th April, 2021 and the consequential notices issued under Section 156 and Section 274 read with Section 270A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (`the Act').
2. It was stated in the petition that assessment order was passed under Section 143(3) read with Section 144B of the Act, raising a substantial tax and interest demand of Rs.86,62,88,770/-, without serving the petitioner with the mandatory draft assessment order along with show cause notice, as contemplated in Section 144B of the Act, although, the petitioner's declared income was varied to its prejudice.
3. Notice was issued in the present writ petition on 18th May, 2021 and the counsel for the respondent had sought time to take instructions in the present matter. In the meantime, the operation of the impugned orders was stayed.
4. Today, the learned counsel for the respondent states that he has received instructions in the matter to the effect that the impugned orders may be set aside and the matter may be remanded to the Assessing Officer (`AO') for determining the matter afresh.
5. For framing assessment under Section 143(3) of the Act, in terms of Section 144B(1)(xvi)(b) of the Act (as it stood prior to the amendment brought into effect by the Finance Act, 2022), the National Faceless Assessment Centre (`NaFAC') before making a variation to the income which is prejudicial to the assessee, was mandated to provide an opportunity to the assessee to show cause as to why the proposed variation should not be made and such a notice should be accompanied with the draft assessment order, proposed to be passed.
6. In the present case, admittedly, no show cause notice, as contemplated under Section 144B(1)(xvi)(b) of the Act was served on the petitioner, thereby depriving the petitioner of its statutory right to file a response as well as place the documents on record in support of its response and to be heard before passing of the final assessment order.
7. We therefore, set aside the assessment order dated 30th April, 2021 and the consequential notices issued under Section 156 and Section 274 read with Section 270A of the Act and remand the matter to the respondent No. 1 to complete the assessment proceedings within a period of twelve weeks from today, in accordance with law.
8. We make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the controversy in the writ petition.
9. With the above directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.
The failure to provide a draft assessment order and show cause notice under Section 144B violates the assessee's rights, necessitating annulment of the assessment order.
Assessment orders must be issued in compliance with procedural requirements, including mandatory draft orders and show cause notices to uphold principles of natural justice.
A writ petition is maintainable in cases of violation of natural justice, even when an appeal exists, especially concerning mandatory procedures outlined in statutory law.
Assessment orders under the Income Tax Act must comply with mandatory procedural requirements, including issuing a show-cause notice and draft assessment order, to uphold principles of natural justic....
The court held that an assessment order is invalid if not preceded by a show cause notice, as required by Section 144B of the Income Tax Act.
Assessment orders issued without mandatory show-cause notice violate principles of natural justice, making them non est, despite the availability of an appellate remedy.
Mandatory procedures under the Income Tax Act for show cause notices and draft assessments must be followed to ensure natural justice; failure to comply renders the assessment order invalid.
Failure to issue a draft assessment order and show cause notice in tax assessments is a violation of statutory procedures and natural justice, justifying the annulment of the assessment order.
The court reaffirmed that assessments must comply with statutory procedures to ensure natural justice, nullifying orders that do not adhere to the stipulated process outlined in Section 144B of the I....
The mandatory nature of the provisions under Section 144B(1)(xvi)(b) and 144B(9) of the Income-tax Act, emphasizing the consequences of non-compliance with the procedural requirements.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.