SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Saurabh Banerjee, JJ.
Karuna Nidhan - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 5027 of 2019
Decided On : 12-10-2022




The court directed the administrative authorities to resolve outstanding issues regarding entitlements within a specified time, highlighting the procedural route for grievance resolution in administrative matters.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Writ of Certiorari and Mandamus - The petitioner sought quashing of orders declining Transport Allowance and issuance of a writ directing grant of Back wages and other benefits related to their attachment for Flying Duty. (Para 1)

(B) Administrative Authorities - The court directs the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, to decisively address the pending issues raised regarding the petitioner’s financial entitlements based on previous communications from the DG, CRPF. (Para 4)

(C) Finality of orders - The petition is disposed of with a directive to convey outcomes, allowing recourse to challenge for further grievances. (Para 6)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought relief against declining orders on allowances while on Flying Duty, referencing prior correspondence by the DG, CRPF, to resolve his financial status.

Findings of Court:
The Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs must decide the issues raised within three months, with notification of outcome to the petitioner.

Issues: Whether the petitioner is entitled to Transport Allowance and other benefits while on Flying Duty and the procedural outcome of the pending administrative issues raised.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasizes the necessity for administrative resolution of outstanding issues affecting the petitioner’s financial benefits, reaffirming the path of administrative redress by the Secretary of Home Affairs.

Result: Writ petition disposed of.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's relief requests outlined. (Para 1 , 1)
2. respondent's position on unresolved financial issues. (Para 2 , 3)
3. direction to mha for decision within three months. (Para 4 , 5)
4. closure of the petition with right to challenge. (Para 6 , 7)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. By way of the present petition, the petitioner seeks following reliefs:

    i. Issue a writ of certiorari for quashing of order dated 25.02.2019 rejecting the representation dated 18.12.2018 AND

    ii. Issue of a writ of certiorari for quashing of the order dated 09.11.2017 and order dated 21.12.2017 declining grant of Transport Allowance to the petitioner; AND

    iii. Issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to grant the petitioner Back wages, Deputation Allowance and Transport Allowance and other consequential benefits from the time the petitioner was on attachment for Flying Duty i.e. w.e.f 23.01.2009 in the Post of Co-Pilot/Commandant.

2. In the counter-affidavit filed by the respondents, it is stated that vide DO letter No. M.V-l/2011-DA-4(Fin) dated 31.05.2011 addressed to Home Secretary, the DG CRPF had expressed that the petitioner continues to lose out in terms of financial benefits and requested for intervention of MHA for settling the status of the officer either on absorption basis in BSF or on deputation with clear terms and conditions and also to issue clear terms & conditions to enable the petitioner to draw the flying incentive. Thereafter, as per DO letter No. M.V-l/2011-DA-4(Fin) dated 27/06/2011 addressed to Home Secretary, the DG CRPF had also submitted that the status of CAPF Pilots in BSF Air Wing still remains un-addressed and requested for deciding the status of CAPF officers flying with BSF Air Wing and to take them on deputation as per the terms and conditions laid down for other similarly placed officers.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the issues raised in the present petition are lying for the final decision of the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs.

4. With a view to close the lid over the pending unaddressed issues involved, it is deemed appropriate to direct the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs to take a final decision qua the two letters dated 31.05.2011 and 27.06.2011 issued by the DG, CRPF mentioned above, within three months from today.

5. The petitioner being one of the concerned/effected parties, the Secretary, MHA is also directed to convey the outcome thereof to the petitioner within one week thereafter.

6. In view thereof, nothing further survives in this petition. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

7. Needless to state that if the petitioner is still aggrieved by the decision, he may challenge the same before the appropriate forum.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top