SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, ASHA MENON
Pradeep Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner challenges denial of increment and pay step. (Para 1)
2. representation remains undecided; request for additional grounds. (Para 2 , 3)
3. court directs representation resolution by authority. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
4. writ petition disposed with directions. (Para 7)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)--Present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 25th September 2020, issued by Respondent No. 5 vide which first annual increment as Assistant Commandant with effect from 01st July 2010 had been denied to the Petitioner. The Petitioner also challenges the order dated 21st January 2021, issued by Respondent No. 5 vide which stepping up the pay of the Petitioner was denied allegedly in a mechanical manner. Petitioner also seeks a direction to the Respondent No. 2 to 6 to grant the first annual increment to the Petitioner as Assistant Commandant with effect from 01st July 2010 along with the consequential benefits arising therefrom by way of re-calculation of the monetary and other benefits.

2. A perusal of the paper book reveals that the Petitioner has made a representation dated 12th February, 2021, which is annexed as Annexure `O' to the present writ petit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top