Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Briskworld Ventures Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Central Warehousing Corporation – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. tender disqualification basis. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments on reason for disqualification. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. response to disqualification claims. (Para 5) |
| 4. court standard for tender decisions. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. petition dismissal confirmed. (Para 13 , 14) |
JUDGMENT
1. The instant petition has been filed by the Petitioner being aggrieved by the rejection of the bid submitted by the Petitioner for a tender floated by the Respondents herein for Appointment of Strategic Alliance Management Operator (SAMO) for providing Management, Handling and Operation Services at Inland Container Depot (ICD), Loni, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, on the ground that the Petitioner's tender is non-responsive due to deficiencies in the bid document.
2. Shorn of details, the facts leading to the instant Writ Petition are as under:
a. The Respondents herein issued a tender bearing No. CWC/RO-DLI/ICD-Loni/SAMO/TENDER/2022-23 dated 30.06.2022 for Appointment of Strategic Alliance Management Operator (SAMO) for providing Management, Handling and Operation Services at Inland Container Depot (ICD), Loni, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, on the terms and conditions of the contract which w
Courts must not interfere in bid rejection unless the decision is irrational or arbitrary; adherence to tender requirements is essential for bid acceptance.
Judicial review in tender matters is limited to assessing arbitrariness, irrationality, or mala fides; decisions should reflect fair competition and not accommodate late submissions of corrected bids....
Judicial review of tender decisions is limited to instances of mala fides or arbitrary actions; a tendering authority's judgment on technical specifications is paramount unless proven fundamentally f....
The court upheld the authority's discretion in evaluating tender bids, emphasizing the need for compliance with mandatory conditions and the absence of arbitrariness in disqualification decisions.
The court emphasized the limited scope of judicial review in tender matters, the importance of punctilious and rigid enforcement of tender terms, and the uniform application of tender requirements to....
Judicial review of tendering decisions is limited to assessing legality, with courts refraining from substituting the tender authority's decisions unless in cases of illegality or manifest arbitrarin....
The court emphasized the need for restraint and deference to the tendering authority's interpretation of tender documents, especially in technical matters, and highlighted the importance of public in....
Judicial review in tender matters limited to arbitrariness or mala fides; courts defer to authority's bid compliance assessment, refusing substitution unless perverse.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
