Back
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI, SIDDHARTHA SAH
Super Construction Associates – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. tender issued; petitioner's bid rejected on grounds. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. itb requires equipment, personnel, bank document proofs. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. petitioner contests rejection: shared machinery permissible. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. strict itb compliance essential for bid responsiveness. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 5. limited judicial review in bona fide tenders. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 6. bid non-compliant; employer decision upheld. (Para 26 , 27) |
| 7. no locus to challenge rival bidder. (Para 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 8. writ petition dismissed. (Para 31) |
Judgment :
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
1. Chief Engineer, Uttarakhand Rural Roads Development Agency issued a Notice Inviting Tender on 02.03.2024, inviting item rate bids in two bid system for various construction works under Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojna (PMGSY). Pursuant to said notice, petitioner submitted bid in respect of work of up-gradation of Khunt-Kakrighat Motor Road to Charnbend Motor Road.
2. Procurement Evaluation Committee recommended to reject the technical bid of petitioner and the said recommendation was accepted by the Bid Accepting Authority vide order dated 12.08.2024. Reasons indi
Judicial review in tender matters limited to arbitrariness or mala fides; courts defer to authority's bid compliance assessment, refusing substitution unless perverse.
In tender matters, judicial review is limited; courts defer to tender authority's bid responsiveness assessment unless arbitrary, mala fide or perverse, prioritizing public interest in infrastructure....
The decision of the employer in interpreting the conditions of eligibility in a tender document must be respected unless it is shown to be arbitrary, outrageous, and highly unreasonable.
Judicial review of tender processes is limited; courts should respect the authority's discretion unless there is clear evidence of arbitrariness or irrationality.
The employer's decision regarding qualifications and eligibility of a bidder must be respected, and interference is warranted only if the decision is unjust or unreasonable.
The court emphasized the need for restraint and deference to the tendering authority's interpretation of tender documents, especially in technical matters, and highlighted the importance of public in....
The court upheld the authority's discretion in evaluating tender bids, emphasizing the need for compliance with mandatory conditions and the absence of arbitrariness in disqualification decisions.
The court emphasized the limited scope of judicial review in tender matters, the importance of punctilious and rigid enforcement of tender terms, and the uniform application of tender requirements to....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
