SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV NARULA
Johney Reberio – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. enquiry process under posh act (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
2. arguments for representation rights (Para 12 , 13)
3. court's view on rule 7(6) implication (Para 14 , 15 , 16)
4. limitations of representation in domestic inquiries (Para 17 , 18 , 19)
5. distinction of inquiry from court proceedings (Para 20 , 21)
6. petition dismissal and order (Para 22)

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Narula, J.(Oral)

CM APPL.44487/2022 (seeking exemption)

1. Exemption is granted, subject to all just exceptions.

2. The Petitioner shall file legible and clearer copies of exempted documents, compliant with practice rules, before the next date of hearing.

3. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 14547/2022 & CM APPL.44486/2022 (stay)

4. The Petitioner is facing an enquiry before the Internal Complaints Committee/Respondent No. 2 [`ICC'] of GIZ India constituted under provisions of the Prevention of Sexual Harassment at Workplace Act, 2013 [`POSH Act'] and the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Rules, 2013 [`Rules'].

5. Petitioner seeks to be represented in the said enquiry proceedings by a person of legal background. In this regard, he is agg

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top