IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Sanjeev Sachdeva, Tushar Rao Gedela, JJ.
Pragya Shukla (Dr.) - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 9454 of 2017 and W.P.(C) 10140 of 2017
Decided On : 19-10-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge against dismissal of petitioner's application (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. argument on qualification and eligibility criteria (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. discussion on non-recognition of teaching institutions (Para 13 , 14 , 16) |
| 4. court's interpretation of rules on experience after pg (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 5. dismissal of writ petitions without costs (Para 24 , 42) |
JUDGMENT
Tushar Rao Gedela, J.
W.P.(C) 9454/2017
1. The petitioner challenges the impugned judgment dated 23.05.2017 in OA No. 4690/ 2014 and Order dated 10.08.2017 in RA No. 181/2017 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as "Tribunal"), whereby the aforesaid OA of the Petitioner was dismissed.
2. By way of an application bearing CM No. 42645/2017 under Order 1 Rule 10 of CPC, filed by the Petitioner, this Court vide Order dated 08.01.2018 permitted the erstwhile Medical Council of India now National Medical Commission, to assist the Court at the time of hearing of arguments. The Medical Council of India is hereinafter referred to as "MCI" for convenience.
3. The facts involved in the present case, capitulated in the impugned order, are as under:
A. The Union Public Service Commission-Respondent No.2 (hereinafter referred to as "UPSC") issued Advertisement No. 15/2013 published in Employment News dated 12-18 October, 2013 inviting online recruitment applications for recruitment by selection for various posts including 14 posts of Assistant Professor (Radiotherapy) in the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (Vacancy No.l3101509112 at serial number 9). Out of the 14 posts, 2 were reserved for SC, 1 for ST and 4 for OBC. Remaining 7 posts were for unreserved category. For selection/ recruitment to the said post, following qualification/experience was prescribed:
"QUALIFICATIONS: ESSENTIAL:
A.EDUCATIONAL:
(i) A recognized medical qualification included in the First or the Second Schedule or Part-II of the Third Schedule (other than licentiate qualifications) to the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956. Holders of educational qualifications included in Part-II of the Third Schedule should also fulfil the conditions stipulated in sub-section (3) of section 13 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956. (ii) Post Graduate degree in the concerned speciality i.e. MD (Radiotherapy), D.M.R.T. or equivalent diploma of two years duration or equivalent.**The candidate holding DNB qualifications would need to get their qualification verified by NBE as whether it is as per the recruitment of the Gazette notification No.MCI-12(2)/2010-Med.Misc. dated 11.6.2012 and produce such verification certificate at the time of interview.
B. EXPERIENCE: Three years' teaching experience in the concerned specialty as Lecturer/Tutor/Registrar/Demonstrator/Senior Resident after the requisite Postgraduate qualification. [Teaching experience in any other post like the post of General Duty Medical Officer/Medical Officer shall not be considered for eligibility purpose for recruitment to teaching posts]."
4. The petitioners in both the OA's before the Tribunal, claiming to be possessed of the requisite qualifications and experience, applied for the post of Assistant Professor (Radiotherapy) under the General category. It is stated that the results were published in the Employment News of 27 September - 03 October, 2014 for the post of Assistant Professor (Radiotherapy), Teaching Specialist Sub-Cadre of Central Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. The name of Dr. (Ms.) Pragya Shukla (OA No.4690/2014) was at number 4 out of the 8 recommended candidates. The petitioner was intimated vide communication dated 07.08.2014 that her name was recommended to the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare for appointment to the post of Assistant Professor (Radiotherapy). Para 2 of the said communication, however, contained a stipulation that the offer of appointment would be made only after the Governmen
Teaching experience for medical positions must be obtained from recognized institutions, and non-compliance with statutory qualifications results in disqualification.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that eligibility criteria for the post of Assistant Professor in General Surgery, as per the advertisement and Rules, 2009, require three years tea....
The withdrawal of posts and subsequent re-advertisement due to the amendment of Rule 45 to ensure wider participation of candidates for getting the best talent was not arbitrary or unjustified.
The impugned advertisement is legal, fair and in consonance with the 2021 Rules. The Petitioners cannot be granted any relief by way of a Writ and the present Writ Petitions are liable to be dismisse....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the rejection of the petitioner's candidature for the post of Assistant Professor in Clinical Haematology was arbitrary and unreasonable, as t....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.