SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
Pragya Shukla (Dr.) – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Tushar Rao Gedela, J.

W.P.(C) 9454/2017

1. The petitioner challenges the impugned judgment dated 23.05.2017 in OA No. 4690/ 2014 and Order dated 10.08.2017 in RA No. 181/2017 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as "Tribunal"), whereby the aforesaid OA of the Petitioner was dismissed.

2. By way of an application bearing CM No. 42645/2017 under Order 1 Rule 10 of CPC, filed by the Petitioner, this Court vide Order dated 08.01.2018 permitted the erstwhile Medical Council of India now National Medical Commission, to assist the Court at the time of hearing of arguments. The Medical Council of India is hereinafter referred to as "MCI" for convenience.

3. The facts involved in the present case, capitulated in the impugned order, are as under:

A. The Union Public Service Commission-Respondent No.2 (hereinafter referred to as "UPSC") issued Advertisement No. 15/2013 published in Employment News dated 12-18 October, 2013 inviting online recruitment applications for recruitment by selection for various posts including 14 posts of Assistant Professor (Radiotherapy) in the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (Vacanc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top