SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MINI PUSHKARNA
Gangotri Enterprises Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
General Manager Northern Railaways – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Mini Pushkarna, J.

1. The aforesaid petitions have been filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred as `Act') with prayer for appointment of nominee arbitrator for the respondent, who along with the nominee of the petitioner appointed vide notice dated 25.06.2020, would appoint a presiding Arbitrator and the said Arbitral Tribunal so constituted would adjudicate upon the disputes that have arisen between the parties under the Agreement.

2. The parties entered into Contract Agreements on different dates for execution of various works as awarded to the petitioner by the respondent.

3. In ARB.P. 366/2020, contract between the parties dated 14.01.2009 was for work of `additional works such as construction of boundary wall/retaining wall, circulating area, entry road, service road, RCC Box Bridge and other allied works in connection with development of new passenger terminal at Anand Vihar', for an amount of Rs.17,70,25,337.94/-.

4. In ARB.P. 367/2020, contract between the parties dated 15.10.2007 was for work of `Earthwork in filing, blanketing, const. of minor bridges, major bridges, major bridges No.8,) approx. 3 x 12.20






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top