MINI PUSHKARNA
Gangotri Enterprises Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
General Manager Northern Railaways – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
MINI PUSHKARNA, J.
1. The aforesaid petitions have been filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred as ‘Act’) with prayer for appointment of nominee arbitrator for the respondent, who along with the nominee of the petitioner appointed vide notice dated 25.06.2020, would appoint a presiding Arbitrator and the said Arbitral Tribunal so constituted would adjudicate upon the disputes that have arisen between the parties under the Agreement.
2. The parties entered into Contract Agreements on different dates for execution of various works as awarded to the petitioner by the respondent.
3. In ARB.P. 366/2020, contract between the parties dated 14.01.2009 was for work of ‘additional works such as construction of boundary wall/retaining wall, circulating area, entry road, service road, RCC Box Bridge and other allied works in connection with development of new passenger terminal at Anand Vihar’, for an amount of Rs.17,70,25,337.94/-.
4. In ARB.P. 367/2020, contract between the parties dated 15.10.2007 was for work of ‘Earthwork in fil
Bharat Broadband Network Ltd. v. United Telecoms Ltd.
Central Organisation For Railway Electrification v. ECLSPIC- SMO-MCML (JV), A Joint Venture Company
Central Organisation for Railway Electrification vs. ECI – SPIC –SMO-MCML
Perkins Eastman Architects DPC v. HSCC (India) Ltd.
Perkins Eastman Architects DPC v. HSCC (India) Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.