IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Satish Chandra Sharma, Yashwant Varma, JJ.
Rajiv Sinha - Appellant
Versus
Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions - Respondent
W.P.(C) 8056 of 2015 and C.M. No. 25950 of 2022
Decided On : 01-11-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenging pay disparity based on 6th cpc recommendations. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. factual background regarding implementation of pay recommendations. (Para 3) |
| 3. contention regarding policy changes affecting pay disparity. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. judicial review limitations on executive policy. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 5. eligibility criteria for financial benefits in the context of service. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
JUDGMENT
Satish Chandra Sharma, C.J.
1. The present Writ Petition has been filed impugning the Order dated 12.12.2013 passed in O.A. No. 2019 of 2012 (hereafter referred as "Impugned Order") by the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereafter referred as "CAT") in terms of which the CAT upheld the grant of higher pay on non-functional basis as set out in the Office Memorandum dated 24.04.2009 (hereafter referred as "OM dated 24.04.2009") issued by Respondent No. 1, i.e., the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions. The quintessential premise of the Petitioners' case is that the parity of pay in higher pay scale ought to have been granted in terms of the recommendations of the 6th Central Pay Commission (hereafter referred as "CPC") and not as per the OM dated 24.04.2009. Accordingly, by means of the present Petition, the Petitioners have sought that the Impugned Order be set aside and as a consequence the grant of pay parity be made in accordance with recommendations of the 6th CPC.
2. The factual matrix, relevant to the adjudication of the present petition, is set out hereinbelow:
(a) The Petitioners (officers of the Organized Group A Services) were selected by the UPSC and appointed to the Indian Broadcasting (Engineering) Services in different years. At the time of filing of the present Petition, they were employed with Doordarshan.
(b) The associations of the Group 'A' services, made certain demands before the 6th CPC inter-alia pertaining to faster and better career progression.
(c) In March 2008, the 6th CPC issued its Report. As per Para 3.3.12, the recommendations of the 6th CPC accommodated the demands made by the associations of the Group A services in the following terms:
"whenever any IAS officer of a particular batch is posted in the Centre to a particular grade carrying a specific grade pay in Pay bands PB3 or PB4, grant of higher pay scale on Non Functional basis to the Officer belonging to Organized Group of A services that are senior by 2 years or more should be given by the Government. The higher Non-Functional Grade so given to the Officer of Organized Group of A services will be personal to them and will not depend on the Number of vacancies on the Grade. These officers will continue in their existing post and will get substantial posting in the higher grade that they are holding on Non-Functional basis only after vacancy arises in that grade".
(d) On 29.08.2008, the Ministry of Finance notified the recommendations of the 6th CPC through the Gazette of India. Relevant excerpt of the Gazette Notification is reproduced hereinbelow:
| Sl. No. | Recommendations of the Sixth Pay Commission | Decision of the Government |
| (i) | Central Services Group 'A' Grade Pay Rs. 5400 in PB [Rs. 15600-39100] | Accepted |
| Whenever any IAS officer of a particular batch is posted in the Centre to a particular grade carrying a specific grade pay in the Pay Bands PB-3 or PB-4 grant of higher pay scale on non-functional basis to the officers belonging to batches of Organized Group A services that are senior by two years or more should be given by the Government. | Accepted. This will also be applicable to the Indian Police Service and the Indian Forest Service in their respective State cadres for which the relevant cadre controlling authorities will issue the orders. |
(e) On 24.04.2009, Respondent No. 1 issued the OM adopting the recommendations of the 6th CPC, however, prescribing certain conditions which inter-alia included an additional stipulation under Clause 3 of Annex I to the OM to the effect that all the prescribed eligibilit
AI
The court affirmed the government's right to establish eligibility criteria for pay upgrades, reinforcing that recommendations from pay commissions are not mandatory and can be modified under executi....
Financial upgradation under the NFU Scheme requires strict adherence to promotional criteria, and lacking such criteria excludes eligibility for upgradation.
Group B officers granted Grade Pay Rs.4800 via ACP entitled to non-functional upgradation to Rs.5400 after 4 years service, per judicially affirmed principle overriding departmental denial.
Denial of notional pay scale upgradation w.e.f. 01.01.1996 to Inspectors/Superintendents, when granted to comparable accounts cadres, violates Article 14 equality; uniform notional benefits mandated ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that employees who have completed four years of service in a specific grade pay are entitled to the Non Functional Upgradation Scale recommended by....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.