SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
V.K. Tandon – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. introduction of the case and the facts. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. petitioner’s claims and relief requests. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
3. court's examination of eligibility criteria. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
4. determination of applicants' eligibility and claim validity. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
5. final decision and dismissal of the petition. (Para 20 , 21)

JUDGMENT

Satish Chandra Sharma, C.J. The Petitioner before this Court have filed present Petition being aggrieved by the order dated 14.01.2015 passed in OA No. 3728/2013 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal ("CAT"), by which the CAT has declined the prayer for grant of non-functional upgradation in Pay Band-4 (Senior Administrative Grade in the Pay Band of Rs.37,400-67,000 + Rs.10,000/- Grade Pay.

2. The facts of the case reveal that the Petitioners who are either serving employees or who have attained the age of superannuation became members of Central Power Engineering (Group A Service) through a process of selection conducted by Union Public Service Commission during the Years 1977 to 1984.

3. It is undisputed fact that all the Petitioners at the relevant point of time when the OA was preferred were pl































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top