Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
SUDESH BANSAL, SANDEEP TANEJA
Nathi Devi W/o Late Shri Parmeshwar Lal – Appellant
Versus
Vaibhav Galaria – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. contempt petition filed concerning non-payment of dues. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. compliance with previous court orders is discussed. (Para 4 , 5 , 10) |
| 3. no deliberate disobedience found in respondents' actions. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. contempt petition dismissed; no costs ordered. (Para 12 , 13) |
ORDER :
1. We have heard counsel for petitioners, counsel appearing on behalf of respondents-contemnors and perused the record.
2. Petitioners, being Legal Representatives of employee Late Shri Parmeshwar Lal, who allegedly worked as Lecturer in Seth G.R. Chamria P.G. College, Fatehpur, District Sikar, have preferred this Contempt Petition, raising a grievance of non-payment of the dues as per 6th Revised Pay Commission to Parmeshwar Lal by the management and committing disobedience of the directions issued by the Division Bench vide judgment and order dated 06.11.2015 passed in bunch of Special Appeals (Writ), being lead case D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No. 663/2015 titled as State of Rajasthan & Anr. Vs. The Management Committee Shri Bhagwan Das Todi College. In addition, petitioners have also alleged non-compliance of the order dated 09.08.2018 passed in bunch of contempt petitions including
In contempt proceedings, the court has limited jurisdiction and cannot adjudicate claims beyond compliance issues as defined in prior orders, reaffirming the need for independent adjudication in sepa....
Contempt proceedings cannot determine individual claims without prior adjudication; the court's role is limited to assessing willful disobedience of specific orders.
Contempt Petition - Merely because an order or decree is executable, that would not take away Court’s jurisdiction to deal with a matter under Act of 1971 on satisfaction that there has been violatio....
The court found no grounds for contempt as the government complied with orders despite delays, emphasizing compliance assessment only.
Contempt of court requires willful disobedience of a court order; mere delay, especially under extenuating circumstances, does not constitute contempt.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
