SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
Brij Mohan Sehgal – Appellant
Versus
Pankaj Sanghi – Respondent


Table of Content
1. jurisdiction and authority over public prosecutors (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. violation of financial rules and implications thereof (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. defense arguments against petitioner's allegations (Para 11 , 14 , 16)
4. issues raised regarding biometric procurement and transfers (Para 12 , 13)
5. assessment of financial irregularities and administrative actions (Para 18 , 19)
6. judicial discretion in taking cognizance of complaints (Para 20)
7. final ruling dismissing the revision petition (Para 21)

JUDGMENT

Swarana Kanta Sharma, J. That the present Criminal Miscellaneous Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is directed against the impugned order dated 14.11.2019 passed by learned MM-07 (Central) Delhi, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in Criminal Complaint Case No. 2750/2019 and impugned order dated 13.04.2022 passed by learned ASJ (Central) Delhi, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, in Criminal Revision No.82/2020, titled as `Sh. Brij Mohan Sehgal vs. Pankaj Sanghi' under Section 200 of Cr.P.C., whereby the learned Magistrate and the learned ASJ, dismissed the CC No.2750/2019 and Criminal Revision Petition No.82/2020 by passing the impugned orders dated 14.11.2019 and 13

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top