SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
Preeti – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Table of Content
1. context of the criminal complaint and agreements. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments regarding the petitioner's involvement. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. legal principles governing directors' liability. (Para 8 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
4. need for specific allegations against directors. (Para 20 , 21 , 22)
5. quashing of summoning order against the petitioner. (Para 24 , 25)

JUDGMENT

Swarana Kanta Sharma, J. By way of the present petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, the petitioner seeks quashing of the summoning order dated 28.11.2018 passed by then Metropolitan Magistrate-04, Patiala House Courts, Delhi and the Criminal Complaint no. 16201/2017 titled as "M/s PEC Ltd. v. M/s KS Oil Ltd. & Ors." and all its consequent proceeding pending in the court of MM-04 (NI Act), or any successor court at Patiala House Courts,New Delhi.

2. Briefly stated, facts of the case, leading to the fling of present petition, are as under:

a. That seven agreements (High Seas Sales contracts) were executed between the complainant and the accused no.1 company i.e., K.S. Oils Ltd. for importing crude oil through complainant company, on the respective dates: (i) Two agreements

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top