Sanjha Chulha vs Sanjha Chulha

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIBHU BAKHRU, AMIT MAHAJAN
Sanjha Chulha – Appellant
Versus
Sanjha Chulha – Respondent

Table of Content
1. appellant's business establishment and trademark applications. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 12)
2. arguments raised by both parties regarding trademark use. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
3. court’s findings on trademark usage and descriptiveness. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)
4. analysis of registration and prior use of trademarks. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 38)
5. legal clarifications regarding the exclusivity of trademark use. (Para 52 , 53 , 54 , 55)
6. final decision and dismissal of the appeal. (Para 56 , 57)

JUDGMENT

Vibhu Bakhru, J. The appellant has filed the present appeal impugning an order dated 04.08.2022 (hereafter `the impugned order') passed by the learned Commercial Court, whereby the appellant's application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereafter `the CPC') was dismissed and the respondents' application under Order XXXIX Rule 4 of the CPC was allowed.

2. Respondent no. 1, a partnership firm constituted by respondent nos. 2 and 3 as its partners, is engaged in the business of running a restaurant under the name SANJHA CHULHA in Faridabad, Haryana. The appellant, a registered partnership firm with Mr Nand Ki