Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
VIBHU BAKHRU, AMIT MAHAJAN
Gulab Oil and Food (Ahmedabad) Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Madhu Gupta – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. trademark ownership and business history. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 2. jurisdiction and prima facie rights. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 3. protection for prior users of trademarks. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 4. appellant's legal arguments against injunction. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 5. court's reasoning on business operation and ownership. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 6. succession and trademark rights. (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45) |
| 7. likelihood of confusion in passing off cases. (Para 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50) |
| 8. conclusion and order of the court. (Para 51 , 52) |
JUDGMENT
Vibhu Bakhru, J.
1. The appellant has filed the present appeal impugning an order dated 30.03.2021 (hereafter `the impugned order') passed by the learned Commercial Court, whereby the application filed by the respondent under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereafter `the CPC') was allowed and the appellant's application under Order XXXIX Rule 4 of the CPC, seeking vacation of the ad interim order, was rejected.
2. The appellant has been restrained from using the trademark "Gulab" in connection with namkeen, roasted and baked products
 |  |
A registered trademark must be protected against infringement if it has established goodwill, even in the face of claims regarding dissimilarity of packaging.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the protection of registered trademarks, the establishment of goodwill and reputation, and the likelihood of confusion among consumers in passin....
Descriptive terms in trade, such as 'Sanjha Chulha', cannot be exclusively owned despite trademark registration; common usage undermines claims of infringement.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the protection of trademarks and prevention of passing off, based on prior adoption, continuous commercial user, goodwill, and deceptive similarity....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the appellant had a prima facie case against the respondent for trademark infringement, and the Trial Court's findings were contrary to the fa....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that in cases of trademark infringement, the likelihood of confusion and deception among the public must be supported by evidence. The court emp....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
