SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.
Anit Kumar @ Anit Singh - Appellant
Versus
Pooja - Respondent
CM(M) 385 of 2022 & CM Appl. 20173 of 2022
Decided On : 03-11-2022




Custody petitions require proper jurisdiction assessment, with courts allowed to make interim orders that serve the child's welfare regardless of jurisdictional questions.

Headnote:(A) Guardian & Wards Act, 1890 - Section 9(1) - Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act - Section 6 - Jurisdiction related to custody matters - Court emphasizes the importance of territorial jurisdiction for custody petitions, requiring a preliminary issue to be framed on this point before proceeding. (Paras 2, 4, 5)

(B) Mixed questions of law and fact - The determination of territorial jurisdiction is a mixed question of law and fact that must be addressed adequately by the Family Court before further proceedings can continue. (Para 5)

(C) Interim custody arrangements - The Family Judge is permitted to make temporary custody arrangements in the best interest of the child while the issue of jurisdiction is examined. (Para 6)

Facts of the case:
Petition filed challenging an order regarding custody jurisdiction, highlighting the child’s residence in Muzzafar Nagar and implications of statutory provisions.

Findings of Court:
The Family Court is instructed to evaluate territorial jurisdiction with a preliminary finding and ensure interim arrangements for the child's welfare are made.

Issues: Identification of competent court jurisdiction regarding custody and abandonment claims.

Ratio Decidendi: Issues of jurisdiction and temporary custody are critical; the Family Court must frame the jurisdictional issue and cannot reject petitions based solely on jurisdictional grounds without proper evaluation.

Result: Petition disposed of with directions.

Table of Content
1. filing jurisdiction challenge presented. (Para 1)
2. arguments regarding territorial jurisdiction. (Para 2 , 3)
3. court's observations on jurisdiction and interim custody. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
4. conclusion and order issued. (Para 7 , 8)

JUDGMENT

Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)--Present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 07.04.2022.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that admittedly the child is ordinarily a resident of Muzzafar Nagar and therefore in view of Section 9(1) of the Guardian & Wards Act, 1890, the Court of Muzzafar Nagar shall have the jurisdiction to entertain the petition.

3. Learned counsel for the respondent has opposed the same and has relied upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case titled Ruchi Majoo vs. Sanjeev Majoo, (2011) 6 SCC 479.

4. The Relevant para of the impugned order dated 07.04.2022 reads as under:

    "If this court does not have territorial jurisdiction, the petition cannot be rejected under Order Vll Rule 11 CPC. lf this court does not have territorial jurisdiction, the petition will have to be returned for filing before the court having territorial jurisdiction. The child is about 3 years old now. In view of Section 6 of Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, the custody of the child has to be ordinarily with the mother. The question whether the petitioner voluntarily abandoned the custody of the child is a matter of trial. The question of territorial jurisdiction is a mixed question of law in fact and the same cannot be decided at this stage. The judgments cited at bar by Ld. Counsel for respondent have different facts. Accordingly the application of the respondent is dismissed and is directed to file to the petition and the application under Section 12 of the G.W. Act."

5. Perusal of the para makes it clear that the learned Judge, Family Court has not returned any finding as to the territorial jurisdiction. The learned Judge, Family Court is directed to frame a preliminary issue on the point of territorial jurisdiction and return a finding on the question of the territorial jurisdiction after conducting necessary enquiry. The enquiry may include taking of evidence on this point.

6. However, this will not in any manner deprive the learned Family Judge to pass any order regarding the interim custody in accordance with law till the decision of the preliminary issue, in the welfare of the child, as a temporary arrangement.

7. With these observations, the present petition along with the pending application stands disposed of.

8. Parties are directed to appear before the learned Judge, Family Court on 01st December, 2022.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top