Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
Krishan Chand Garg – Appellant
Versus
Nidhi Garg – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of domestic violence case (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding issuance of summons (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's examination of the appeal (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. refrain from exercising jurisdiction (Para 9) |
| 5. dismissal of the petition (Para 10) |
JUDGMENT
1. This petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) is directed against the order dated 23.04.2014, passed by the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-03, West District, Delhi in Criminal Appeal No.18/2/14, whereby an appeal under Section 29 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (DV Act) has been dismissed against the order of summoning dated 26.08.2013, passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate.
2. During the pendency of the instant petition, petitioner No.1 has expired. Therefore, his name is deleted from the array of parties. The petitioner No.1 was the father-in-law of the respondent and petitioner No.2 is the mother-in-law. Since petitioner No.1 has expired therefore, this petition is only confined to the mother-in-law.
3. The facts of the case are that respondent No.2 married the son of the petitioner, namely, Ajay Garg on 26.11.1995. O
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
