SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI
Bell Finvest India Limited – Appellant
Versus
AU Small Finance Bank Limited – Respondent


Table of Content
1. request for arbitration under a&c act. (Para 1 , 2)
2. petitioners' arguments for arbitration rights. (Para 3 , 4)
3. respondent contests arbitrability based on sarfaesi act. (Para 5)
4. court discusses jurisdiction and merits. (Para 6 , 7)
5. clarification on non-arbitrability of disputes. (Para 8 , 9)
6. petition dismissed; applications disposed. (Para 10 , 11)

JUDGMENT

Anup Jairam Bhambhani J.

By way of the present petition under section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 ('A&C Act' for short), the petitioners seek appointment of an arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes that are stated to have arisen with the respondent from Rupee Facility Agreement dated 26.04.2019 ('Rupee Facility Agreement').

2. Notice on this petition was issued on 07.04.2021; whereupon counter-affidavit dated 05.07.2021 was filed by the respondent.

3. Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, learned counsel for the petitioner has premised his submissions on section 11 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 ('SARFAESI Act' for short), which, counsel submits, creates a statutory arbitration agreement between the parties. For c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top