DELHI HIGH COURT
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Angellina Arenja – Appellant
Versus
Nitij Arenja – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to family court order. (Para 1) |
| 2. counsel's arguments on urgency. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. court's direction for hearing. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. petition disposal order. (Para 7) |
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)
CM APPL. 48629/2022 (exemption)
Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
CM(M) 1210/2022
1. Present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 05.11.2022, which reads as follows:
"05.11.2022
Present: Ms.Ajunee Singh, proxy counsel for the Petitioner. Submissions made.
Put up with the main case file on the next date of hearing i.e. 18.01.2023."
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is aggrieved of the fact that despite an urgent relief having been sought by the petitioner in the application, learned Family Court has not issued the notice. Learned counsel submits that he would be satisfied if the learned Family Court considers the application on merits and passes an order in accordance with law.
3. Mr.Sanjay Abbot, learned counsel for the respondent has raised an objection as to the maintainability of the present petition on the ground that the affidavit annexed with the petition i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.