SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Angellina Arenja – Appellant
Versus
Nitij Arenja – Respondent


Table of Content
1. challenge to family court order. (Para 1)
2. counsel's arguments on urgency. (Para 2 , 3)
3. court's direction for hearing. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
4. petition disposal order. (Para 7)

JUDGMENT

Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)

CM APPL. 48629/2022 (exemption)

Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.

Application stands disposed of.

CM(M) 1210/2022

1. Present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 05.11.2022, which reads as follows:

    "05.11.2022

    Present: Ms.Ajunee Singh, proxy counsel for the Petitioner. Submissions made.

    Put up with the main case file on the next date of hearing i.e. 18.01.2023."

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is aggrieved of the fact that despite an urgent relief having been sought by the petitioner in the application, learned Family Court has not issued the notice. Learned counsel submits that he would be satisfied if the learned Family Court considers the application on merits and passes an order in accordance with law.

3. Mr.Sanjay Abbot, learned counsel for the respondent has raised an objection as to the maintainability of the present petition on the ground that the affidavit annexed with the petition i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top