Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
Kamal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Govt. of NCT Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition seeks quashing of rejection order and alternate plot allotment. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. arguments regarding document submission and rejection of application. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 3. court reviews rejection order and public notice process. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 4. discussion on rehabilitation principles and 1961 scheme. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. assessment of deficiencies and eligibility criteria for applications. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 6. court's conclusion on legality of rejection order. (Para 20 , 21) |
| 7. writ petition dismissed for lack of merit. (Para 22 , 23) |
ORDER
Chandra Dhari Singh, J. (Oral)
1. The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the Petitioner, inter alia, seeking the following reliefs:
(i) Issue a Writ Order or direction thereby quashing the letter dated 30.10.2017; and
(ii) Pass a Writ of Memorandum thereby directing the Respondents to recommend the name of the Petitioner to DDA for allotment of a alternate plot in terms of the Policy of the Respondents.
2. The brief facts of the instant case are that the father of the Petitioner was an Agriculturist by profession and owned an agricultural l
A petitioner must demonstrate compliance with document submission requirements for land allotment following acquisition; rejection upheld when deficiencies persist despite multiple opportunities.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the petitioners were not eligible for alternative plots under the Scheme of 1961 and Section 21 of the DDA Act due to the availability of plot....
Delay and laches can defeat a claim for relief, and the law of limitation must be applied with all its rigour when the statute prescribes a limitation period.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the application for allotment of alternative land should be made within one year of the receipt of compensation as fixed by the Collector, as ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the petitioner's claim for an alternative plot was allowed based on the finding that the petitioner's land was acquired completely, and the co....
The main legal point established is that applications for alternative plot allotment made in line with the respondent's advice and within the specified time should not be rejected based on limitation....
Cancellation of alternate land allotment upheld for non-verification of family members and records; no natural justice breach; government superintendence valid; liberty for fresh eligibility-based ap....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
