SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
Mohan Prasad - Appellant
Versus
Employees State Insurance Corporation - Respondent
W.P.(C) 12490 of 2021
Decided On : 22-11-2022




Court ordered prompt establishment of District Consumer Forum in Shahdara and improvement of infrastructure in Consumer Fora to ensure timely hearings and facilitate mediation under Consumer Protection Act.

Headnote:(A) Consumer Protection Act, 2019 - Establishment of District Consumer Forum - Directions issued for the expeditious establishment of the District Consumer Forum in Shahdara due to inadequate infrastructure and a substantial backlog of pending cases - Registrars directed to prioritize matters for hearing and ensure timely disposal. (Paras 5-12)

(B) Infrastructure Improvement - Mandate for filling vacancies and enhancing infrastructure for efficient hearings and mediation processes in Consumer Fora - Establishment of mediation cells suggested to expedite resolution of disputes. (Paras 8-12)

Facts of the case:
The court addressed concerns relating to the significant backlog of consumer disputes in the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Fora, highlighting the lack of regular hearings, infrastructure deficiencies, and the need for improved case management and mediation facilities across various districts in Delhi.

Findings of Court:
The court recognized the urgent need for the establishment of a District Consumer Forum in Shahdara and directed the government to take prompt action regarding infrastructure and staffing issues. Reports regarding the current status of consumer disputes and infrastructure deficiencies were required to be presented in upcoming hearings.

Issues: The pivotal issues included the establishment of a District Consumer Forum in Shahdara, the need for infrastructure improvement in existing Consumer Fora, and the appointment of necessary staff to expedite the hearing of consumer disputes.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the necessity for timely hearings and proper infrastructure in Consumer Fora to resolve longstanding disputes, mandating the government to take concrete steps to address the issues highlighted in the various reports submitted to the court.

Result: Directives given for expeditious establishment of a District Consumer Forum and improvement in existing Consumer Fora infrastructure.

Table of Content
1. significant backlog in consumer dispute hearings. (Para 2 , 3)
2. need for improved infrastructure and mediation cells. (Para 4)
3. establishment of district consumer forum in shahdara. (Para 5 , 6)
4. filling vacant positions in consumer fora. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
5. utilization of existing mediation centres. (Para 12 , 13)
6. resuming of final hearing matters. (Para 14)
7. next hearing scheduled for ongoing updates. (Para 15 , 16)

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. In the previous order dated 1st November, 2022, it was recorded by this Court that the pendency of consumer disputes before various District Consumer Disputes Redressal Fora (hereinafter "DCDRCs") across Delhi is substantial, especially in matters where evidence has already been concluded and only final arguments are pending. The complete list of such matters pending for final arguments was extracted in the said order dated 1st November, 2022. Various other concerns that were raised in respect of hearings not being held regularly, en-bloc adjournments, lack of infrastructure facilities, etc., were also considered on the said date. Accordingly, the following directions were issued:

    "5.....It is also noted that the report states that there are a large number of matters pending for final arguments after conclusion of evidence. The details of the same are as under:

S. No.Name of DistrictPending Cases
1.East892
2.South-I468
3.South-II533
4.North-East272
5.North-West1210
6.Central459
7.North District502
8.West1500
9.South-West2827
10.New Delhi518

    6. Besides this large pendency of matters even dating back to 2003 in some cases, submissions have been made by various counsels from time to time, regarding the irregularity in holding of hearings at the Consumer Fora, highlighting that the Consumer Fora adjourn matters in the cause list itself, give en-bloc dates, do not sit post 12/1 PM on most days, and do not hold physical hearings. These issues also seem to have been recorded in the inspection reports, placed by the worthy Registrar General. Considering the large pendency of hearing matters and lack of a uniform method of prioritization, to ensure expeditious disposal of such matters, especially where evidence has been concluded long ago, it is directed as under:

    (a) Registrars of the concerned District Fora shall start listing final matters for hearing at 2:30 pm on a daily basis, with effect from 14th November, 2022.

    (b) The said matters shall be listed in a chronological manner, starting from the oldest cases first.

    (d) Advance publication shall be made in the cause list so that the lawyers and litigants are duly informed.

    (e) Monthly reports shall be submitted by the concerned Registrars, District Fora to the worthy Registrar General of the status of disposal of the final matters.

    7. In the meantime, in view of the findings in the report, let a meeting be held in the Chamber of the worthy Registrar General for consideration of the following matters:

    (a) Creation of a District Consumer Forum in Shahdara, which is the only district lacking a District Forum;

    (b) Feasibility of change of nomenclature of DCDRC (South I) and DCDRC (South II), as per clause (ii) of paragraph 11 of the report extracted above.

    (c) Provision of requisite infrastructure in all the District Fora, wherever the same is currently lacking.

    (d) Feasibility and Modalities for creation of mediation cells at the relevant District Consumer Fora or creating arrangements with existing mediation centres for deputation of mediators on fixed days and times, while creation of permanent centres is underway.

    8. The said meeting shall be attended by:

    (a) President/member each of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Fora in Delhi;

    (b) Registrar, Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission;

    (c) Secretary, Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food & Public Distribution, GNCTD;

    (d) Mr. Satyakam and Mr. Sameer Vashisht, ld. ASCs, GNCTD;

    (e) Counsel(s)



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top