Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
State – Appellant
Versus
Pramod Kumar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of the complainant's allegations (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. arguments regarding trial court's discharge decision (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. principles regarding framing of charges (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 4. consent and deception in cases of rape (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 5. errors in trial court's discharge reasoning (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41) |
| 6. court's decision to set aside discharge order (Para 42) |
| 7. final directives and conclusion of the court (Para 43 , 44) |
JUDGMENT
Swarana Kanta Sharma, J.
1. The petitioner i.e. the State through instant petition, filed under Sections 397/401 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, seeking setting aside of order dated 23.07.2018 passed by learned ASJ/SFTC-2 (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in case No. 283/2018 titled as "State v. Pramod Kumar" in FIR bearing no. 122/2017, Police Station DBG Road, and direct framing of charges against the respondent and consequent trial in accordance with law.
FACTUAL MATRIX
2. The brief facts of the case are that on 06.07.2017, a complaint was received at Police Station DBG
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
