JUDGMENT :

Subhash Chand, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the O.P. No.2.

2. The present criminal revision has been preferred against the order dated 22nd March, 2023 passed by the learned AJC-XV-cum-FTC-(CAW), Ranchi in S.T. Case No.18 of 2023, whereby and whereunder the discharge application for the offence under Sections 420 and 376 of the I.P.C. has been rejected.

3. The brief facts leading to this criminal revision are that the informant—victim gave the written information on 16th April, 2022 with these allegations that she came in contact of one Mr. Jitendra Kumar over the mobile phone. Thereafter both began to exchange talk over the mobile phone. One day, Jitendra Kumar called her to his room and allured her to marry and established physical relation with her. He also asked her not to tell in regard to occurrence to anyone and he would get marry her. However, she did not disclose this occurrence to anyone. He used to come to her house and whenever found opportunity being her alone he used to establish physical relation with her. In the year 2020, after death of her mother she was married with one Shravan Kumar a