SUBHASH CHAND
Rabindra Mahto @ Rabinder Mahto S/o Birsa Mahto – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
ORDER :
1. This Criminal Revision has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner against the order dated 24.03.2022 passed by the learned AJC-XV-cum-FTC (CAW), Ranchi in Miscellaneous Criminal Application No. 405 of 2022 arising out of S.T. Case No. 111 of 2022, corresponding to Dhurwa P.S. Case No. 179 of 2021, whereby the discharge petition filed under Section 227 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been rejected.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that from the allegations made in the FIR and the evidence collected by the Investigating Officer, no alleged offence is made out against the petitioner. The victim was major and widow lady. She was consenting party and much aware in regard to the consequences of establishing physical relation with any person. The consent was never obtained by playing any fraud for deceiving the victim.
3. Learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2 vehemently opposed the contentions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and contended that the prosecution case is well corroborated with the testimony of the victim and the alleged offence is made out against the petitioner at the stage of fr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.