SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
NAVIN CHAWLA
Sporta Technologies Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Virat Saxena – Respondent


Table of Content
1. establishment and ownership of the dream11 marks. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
2. allegations of trademark infringement and passing off. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
3. court proceedings and defendant's failure to participate. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
4. plaintiff's legal arguments regarding infringement. (Para 19 , 20 , 21)
5. court's analysis of trademark rights and passing off. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)
6. ruling in favor of plaintiffs and granting relief. (Para 27 , 28 , 29)

JUDGMENT

Navin Chawla, J.

1. The present suit has been filed seeking a decree of permanent injunction restraining the defendant, its proprietor, employees, partners, representatives and/or others acting for and on their behalf from using the mark `Dream11' or any deceptively similar variant thereof, as a trade mark, trade name or domain name www.dream11.bet or on social media, email addresses or in any other manner, which amounts to the infringement of and/or passing off the plaintiffs' trade marks as listed in the plaint, such as `Dream11// ' (hereinafter referred to as `Dream11 Marks').

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

2. The plaintiff no. 1 is a private limited company incorporated on 21.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top