SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
Madhu Jain – Appellant
Versus
Shashi Rani – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, J. (Oral)--The Present revision petition has been filed by the Petitioner, tenant, assailing the eviction order dated 8th June, 2022 passed by the Rent Controller, KKD Courts (Shahdara) Delhi, in respect of shop no. 2, forming part of the property no. 213, Karkardooma Village, Delhi-92 (`tenanted premises'), whereby the Rent Controller has dismissed the Tenant's leave to defend.

Submissions of the petitioner

2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the finding of the Rent Controller that the Respondent, landlady, has a bona fide requirement for the tenanted premises is incorrect. He states that the averments of the Respondent is that the tenanted premises are required for earning personal income due to her imminent retirement and that she intends to open tutorial classes to teach children, including poor children and to support her children financially as well. He states that the assertion of the Respondent that she wishes to teach poor children contradicts her assertions that she requires a tenanted premises for running tutorial classes for earning income. He further states that there is no evidence on record that the Respondent is i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top