DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
Madhu Jain – Appellant
Versus
Shashi Rani – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, J. (Oral)--The Present revision petition has been filed by the Petitioner, tenant, assailing the eviction order dated 8th June, 2022 passed by the Rent Controller, KKD Courts (Shahdara) Delhi, in respect of shop no. 2, forming part of the property no. 213, Karkardooma Village, Delhi-92 (`tenanted premises'), whereby the Rent Controller has dismissed the Tenant's leave to defend.
Submissions of the petitioner
2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the finding of the Rent Controller that the Respondent, landlady, has a bona fide requirement for the tenanted premises is incorrect. He states that the averments of the Respondent is that the tenanted premises are required for earning personal income due to her imminent retirement and that she intends to open tutorial classes to teach children, including poor children and to support her children financially as well. He states that the assertion of the Respondent that she wishes to teach poor children contradicts her assertions that she requires a tenanted premises for running tutorial classes for earning income. He further states that there is no evidence on record that the Respondent is i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.