SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 882

MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
Sh. Kanwal Kishore Nagpal – Appellant
Versus
Sh. Brahm Dev Sharma – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Rajesh Bhatia with Mr. Hemant Kakkar, Advocates, for the Petitioners.
Respondent in person.

JUDGMENT

Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, J.

1. The present eviction petition has been filed by the tenants assailing the order dated 29.08.2022, passed by the SCJ acting as Rent Controller, West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi ('Trial Court'), in RC ARC No. 25471/2016, wherein, post-trial, the eviction petition filed by the Respondent, landlord, under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 ('DRC Act') has been allowed.

2. Brief facts as stated by the Respondent, landlord, in the eviction petition filed on 11.09.2014 are as under:

2.1. It is stated that late Sh. Gulshan Nagpal and his son i.e., Petitioner No.1, were inducted as tenants, vide a written rent agreement dated 08.10.1991, in the tenanted premises bearing shop No.1, measuring 8' x 17', located at the ground floor of property No. WX-31C, Jawala Heri Market, Paschim Vihar, New Delhi - 110063 ('tenanted premises') and facing the main road. The Petitioners herein are the legal heirs of late Sh. Gulshan Nagpal.

2.2. It is stated that the tenanted premises are required for the bona fide need of the landlord's son, Mr. Sidharth Sharma, who is unemployed and wants to run his own real estate business. It is further s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top