Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
Rajni Nagpal – Appellant
Versus
Reeta Bhayana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenges to trial court orders (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. evidence procedure and delays (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. court's discretion on granting opportunities (Para 12 , 13) |
| 4. conditions for evidence recording (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. final orders and petition disposal (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
JUDGMENT
Tushar Rao Gedela, J. (Oral)
CM APPL. 51048/2022 (for exemption)
Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
CM(M) 1304/2022
1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner challenges the order dated 13.07.2022, whereby the Trial Court had granted last and final opportunity to file the evidence on behalf of the petitioner on record, subject to Rs. 10,000/-, as cost. Subsequent to the order dated 13.07.2022 it appears that the evidence of PW-2 was filed on record of the Trial Court.
2. The matter was thereafter listed for recording of evidence of plaintiff on 18.07.2022.
3. The petitioner also challenges the order dated 18.07.2022, whereby the petitioner sought waiver of the cost imposed on the previous date of hearing, which was rejected by the learned Trial Court. Learned Trial Court also dismissed an application seeking summoning of witnesses on t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
