SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 4041

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.
Jagat Ram Tanwar – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Bail Appln. 2045 of 2022
Decided On : 21-08-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Jatan Singh, Advocate (VC), for the Petitioner.
Mr. Amit Sahni, APP and SI Arvind Kumar, PS Fatehpur Beri, Delhi.
Mr. Nikhilesh Kumar, Advocate, for the Complainant (VC).

Granting of anticipatory bail and imposition of conditions to ensure cooperation in the investigation.

Headnote:

Anticipatory Bail - Criminal Law - The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner under certain conditions after considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the petitioner's cooperation in the investigation.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 308/506/34 IPC. The petitioner had been granted interim protection earlier.

Finding of the Court:

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner on the condition of furnishing a personal bond and surety, along with other conditions related to cooperation in the investigation and maintaining contact details.

Issues: Anticipatory bail application, cooperation in investigation, conditions for bail

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the petitioner's cooperation in the investigation and the fact that other co-accused had been granted anticipatory bail. The court imposed specific conditions to ensure the petitioner's compliance with the law.

Final Decision: The application for anticipatory bail was granted, subject to the specified conditions.

JUDGMENT

Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)--The present application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 0244/2022 under Sections 308/506/34 IPC registered at PS Fatehpur Beri, Delhi.

2. Vide order dated 08.07.2022 the coordinate bench of this court ordered that no coercive action be taken against the petitioner. Interim protection is continuing since then.

3. Learned APP for the state has fairly submitted that the petitioner has joined the investigation as and when directed by the IO.

4. It has already been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that other two co-accused persons have already been admitted to anticipatory bail on 20.07.2022 by the learned Trial Court.

5. Taking into account the facts and circumstances, the petitioner in the event arrest be admitted to anticipatory bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.20,000/- with one surety of the like amount subject to the satisfaction of learned Trial Court subject to the following conditions:

    a. The petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and appear before the Investigating Officer of the case as and when required;

    b. The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case

    c. The petitioner shall provide his mobile number(s) to the Investigating Officer and keep it operational at all times;

    d. In case of change of residential address and/or mobile number, the petitioner shall intimate the same to the Investigating Officer/ Court concerned by way of an affidavit.

6. The application stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top