SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Krishan Chand Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Sub Registrar VI-B – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner - Mr. Krishan Chand Gupta seeking directions to the Respondents i.e., Respondent No.1 - Sub-Registrar VI-B, Alipur, Delhi, Respondent No.2 - Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Narela, and Respondent No.3 - Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (DSIIDC), to register the lease deed in question, without demanding an amount equal to six times of the prescribed registration fee.

3. The brief chronology of events is that the Petitioner was allotted a plot bearing No.1, Pocket-1, Sector-1, admeasuring 250 sq. mtr. at DSIIDC, Bawana, Delhi, vide allotment in the name of M/s. Krishna Wire Industries, which is stated to a sole proprietary concern of the Petitioner. In the month of July/August, 2010, the Petitioner applied for the execution of the lease deed with the DSIIDC. The application filed by the Petitioner seeking execution of the lease deed was referred to the Revenue Authority, Narela for paying registration fees with three sets of the lease deed. For the said purpose, the Revenue Officer raised a challan of Rs.73,320

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top