IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
N.V. Shravan Kumar, J.
Sri Ven Infra Projects, Hyderabad - Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana and others - Respondent
WP No.3512 of 2025
Decided on : 07-02-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner claims ownership (Para 2) |
| 2. counsel argues for registration (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. registration authority's duty (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. failure to present documents (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. writ petition dismissed (Para 14) |
ORDER :
N.V. Shravan Kumar, J.
This writ petition is filed seeking the following prayer:-
“to declare the action of the 4th Respondent in refusing to receive, register and release the lease deed and mortgage deed presented by the petitioner in respect of land admeasuring 0-17.69 guntas or equivalent 2140 Sq.yards along with temporary structures in Sy No.11/33, situated at Khanamet Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and contrary to the provision of the Registration Act, 1908 and in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th Respondent to receive, register and release lease deed and the mortgage deed in respect of land admeasuring 0-17.69 guntas or equivalent 2140 Sq.yards along with temporary structures in Sy No.11/33, situated at Khanamet Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.”
2. Brief facts to this writ petition are that the petitioner claims to be absolute owner and possessor of the land admeasuring 0-17.69 guntas or equivalent 2140 Sq.yards along with temporary structures in Sy No.11/33, situated at Khanamet Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, having acquired the same through registered sale deed bearing Doc.No.8661 of 2016 dated 11.07.2016. Thereafter, the petitioner on 01.09.2021 executed a Lease deed in favour of M/s. Sreeven Ventures and approached registering authority for registration of lease deed. However, the same was refused and assigned pending document No.P/1250/2021. Aggrieved by same, petitioner filed W.P.No.28348 of 2021 and this Court vide interim order dated 11.11.2021, directed the respondent authorities therein to register and release the pending Doc.No.P/1250/2021 and made clear that such registration would be subject to the outcome of the final orders to be passed in W.P.No.28348 of 2021.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the period of lease dated 01.09.2021 is expired and the petitioner had executed release lease deed. It is further submitted that petitioner by mortgaging the subject property intended to obtain loan from the financial institution and executed a mortgage deed in respect of the subject property and approached the respondent No.4 and requested to register the release lease deed and mortgage deed. However, the respondent No.4 orally refused to register the subject documents.
Aggrieved by the same present writ petition is filed.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the respondent authorities are duty bound to receive, register and release the subject documents and in case of not registering, they shall assign reasons for refusal and pass orders accordingly. As such, it is prayed to direct the registering authority to register and release the subject documents presented in respect of the subject property.
5. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Stamps and Registration placed on record instructions issued by Deputy Collector and Tahsildar, Serilingampally Mandal, relevant portion is extracted here under:-
“In this regard, it is submitted that, as per old revenue records, the lands in Sy No.11 total admeasuring Ac. 359-09 gts of Khanamet village is classified as "Patta" in the name of Gurukul Ghatkesar Trust. Later the land in Sy No. 11 together with others lands in Khanamet village holding by the "Gurukul Ghatkesar Trust" have been declared as Urban Land ceiling Surplus lands vide CC No. H1/4933/76. Hence the subject lands have been notified in list of prohibitory property U/s.22-A of Registration Act, 1908 as the interest of the Government is involved.
The contention of the Writ Petitioner herein is that to process the registration document in respect of temporary struct
A petitioner must comply with statutory requirements for document registration, and failure to provide evidence of proper presentation can lead to dismissal of the writ petition.
A writ of mandamus cannot be issued without evidence of a demand for registration and subsequent refusal; misleading statements in affidavits can lead to dismissal.
A writ of mandamus cannot be issued without evidence of a demand for registration being met with refusal, and parties must follow the procedure outlined in the Registration Act.
A writ of mandamus requires evidence of a demand for public duty performance and refusal; without this, the petition cannot succeed.
A petitioner must comply with mandatory registration procedures, including presenting executed documents, to seek relief in writ jurisdiction.
A writ of mandamus cannot be issued unless there is a clear demand for action by the authority and a refusal to perform a mandatory duty, which was not established in this case.
A party must present documents for registration as per the Registration Act, and failure to do so negates claims of wrongful refusal.
The Sub-Registrar must register documents presented for registration unless legally prohibited, following the Registration Act's provisions.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.