Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR, J
Ven Infra Projects, Hyderabad – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner claims ownership (Para 2) |
| 2. counsel argues for registration (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. registration authority's duty (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. failure to present documents (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. writ petition dismissed (Para 14) |
ORDER :
This writ petition is filed seeking the following prayer:-
2. Brief facts to this writ petition are that the petitioner claims to be absolute owner and possessor of the land admeasuring 0-17.69 guntas or equivalent 2140 Sq.yards along with temporary structures in Sy No.11/33, situated at Khanamet Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, having acquired the same through registered sale deed bearing Doc.No.8661 of 2016 dated 11.07.2016. Thereafter, the petitioner on 01.09.2021 executed a Lease deed in favour of M/s. Sreeven Ventures and approached registering authority for registration of lease deed. However, the same was refused and assigned pending document No.P/1250/2021. Aggrieved by same, petitioner filed W.P.No.28348 of 2021 and this Court vide interim order dated 11.11.2021, directed the respondent authorities therein to register and release the pending Doc.No.P/1250/2021 and made clear that such registration
A petitioner must comply with statutory requirements for document registration, and failure to provide evidence of proper presentation can lead to dismissal of the writ petition.
A writ of mandamus cannot be issued without evidence of a demand for registration and subsequent refusal; misleading statements in affidavits can lead to dismissal.
A writ of mandamus cannot be issued without evidence of a demand for registration being met with refusal, and parties must follow the procedure outlined in the Registration Act.
A writ of mandamus requires evidence of a demand for public duty performance and refusal; without this, the petition cannot succeed.
A petitioner must comply with mandatory registration procedures, including presenting executed documents, to seek relief in writ jurisdiction.
A writ of mandamus cannot be issued unless there is a clear demand for action by the authority and a refusal to perform a mandatory duty, which was not established in this case.
A party must present documents for registration as per the Registration Act, and failure to do so negates claims of wrongful refusal.
The Sub-Registrar must register documents presented for registration unless legally prohibited, following the Registration Act's provisions.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
