SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Telangana) 833

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
N.V. Shravan Kumar, J.
 
Sri Ven Infra Projects, Hyderabad - Appellant  
Versus 
State of Telangana and others - Respondent 
WP No.3512 of 2025
Decided on : 07-02-2025
 

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Vijay Pissay
For the Respondent: Assistant Government Pleader for Stamps and Registration

A petitioner must comply with statutory requirements for document registration, and failure to provide evidence of proper presentation can lead to dismissal of the writ petition.

Headnote:(A) Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 32 and 34 - Writ petition challenging refusal to register lease and mortgage deeds - Petitioner claimed ownership of land and sought registration after executing a lease deed - Registration authority refused citing land's classification as prohibitory property - Court emphasized the necessity of following statutory procedures for registration and the requirement of presenting documents properly - Court found no evidence of proper presentation or refusal by the authority - Writ petition dismissed. (Paras 1-14)

(B) Writ Jurisdiction - Clean Hands Doctrine - A petitioner must approach the court with full disclosure of facts and cannot mislead the court - Failure to provide complete information may lead to dismissal of the petition. (Paras 10-12)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner claimed ownership of land and executed a lease deed, but the registration authority refused to register it, citing the land's classification as prohibitory property. The petitioner alleged oral refusal by the authority, which was disputed.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the petitioner did not follow the necessary procedures for registration and failed to provide evidence of proper presentation of documents.

Issues: The main issues were whether the petitioner properly presented the documents for registration and whether the registration authority's refusal was justified.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the petitioner did not demonstrate compliance with the statutory requirements for registration, and the absence of evidence of proper presentation negated the claim for mandamus.

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. petitioner claims ownership (Para 2)
2. counsel argues for registration (Para 3 , 4)
3. registration authority's duty (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
4. failure to present documents (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
5. writ petition dismissed (Para 14)

 ORDER :

N.V. Shravan Kumar, J.

This writ petition is filed seeking the following prayer:-

“to declare the action of the 4th Respondent in refusing to receive, register and release the lease deed and mortgage deed presented by the petitioner in respect of land admeasuring 0-17.69 guntas or equivalent 2140 Sq.yards along with temporary structures in Sy No.11/33, situated at Khanamet Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and contrary to the provision of the Registration Act, 1908 and in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th Respondent to receive, register and release lease deed and the mortgage deed in respect of land admeasuring 0-17.69 guntas or equivalent 2140 Sq.yards along with temporary structures in Sy No.11/33, situated at Khanamet Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.”

2. Brief facts to this writ petition are that the petitioner claims to be absolute owner and possessor of the land admeasuring 0-17.69 guntas or equivalent 2140 Sq.yards along with temporary structures in Sy No.11/33, situated at Khanamet Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, having acquired the same through registered sale deed bearing Doc.No.8661 of 2016 dated 11.07.2016. Thereafter, the petitioner on 01.09.2021 executed a Lease deed in favour of M/s. Sreeven Ventures and approached registering authority for registration of lease deed. However, the same was refused and assigned pending document No.P/1250/2021. Aggrieved by same, petitioner filed W.P.No.28348 of 2021 and this Court vide interim order dated 11.11.2021, directed the respondent authorities therein to register and release the pending Doc.No.P/1250/2021 and made clear that such registration would be subject to the outcome of the final orders to be passed in W.P.No.28348 of 2021.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the period of lease dated 01.09.2021 is expired and the petitioner had executed release lease deed. It is further submitted that petitioner by mortgaging the subject property intended to obtain loan from the financial institution and executed a mortgage deed in respect of the subject property and approached the respondent No.4 and requested to register the release lease deed and mortgage deed. However, the respondent No.4 orally refused to register the subject documents.

Aggrieved by the same present writ petition is filed.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the respondent authorities are duty bound to receive, register and release the subject documents and in case of not registering, they shall assign reasons for refusal and pass orders accordingly. As such, it is prayed to direct the registering authority to register and release the subject documents presented in respect of the subject property.

5. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Stamps and Registration placed on record instructions issued by Deputy Collector and Tahsildar, Serilingampally Mandal, relevant portion is extracted here under:-

“In this regard, it is submitted that, as per old revenue records, the lands in Sy No.11 total admeasuring Ac. 359-09 gts of Khanamet village is classified as "Patta" in the name of Gurukul Ghatkesar Trust. Later the land in Sy No. 11 together with others lands in Khanamet village holding by the "Gurukul Ghatkesar Trust" have been declared as Urban Land ceiling Surplus lands vide CC No. H1/4933/76. Hence the subject lands have been notified in list of prohibitory property U/s.22-A of Registration Act, 1908 as the interest of the Government is involved.

The contention of the Writ Petitioner herein is that to process the registration document in respect of temporary struct

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top