SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
TV Today Network Limited – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. challenge regarding advertisement surrogate nature (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. interim measures and hearing proceedings (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
3. amendments to complaint redressal mechanism (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
4. final directive on apology broadcasts (Para 11)
5. conclusion of the writ petition (Para 12)

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. The challenge in this case rests on the distinction between club soda and whisky. For persons who consume the same, the distinction is quite clear! However, in the case of advertisements which are alleged to be surrogate, the lines are blurred.

3. This petition has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner - T.V. Today Network Ltd. challenging the impugned order bearing no. N-41011/27/2020-BC.III dated 9th February, 2021 by which the Respondent - Union of India, Ministry of Information & Broadcasting has directed the Petitioner to run an apology scroll in bold legible font at the bottom of the screen for two days continuously, with effect from 0001 hours on 16th February, 2021 to 0001 hours on 18th February, 2021. The operative portion of the order reads as under:

    "..

    WHEREAS the Competent Auth

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top