SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIKAS MAHAJAN
Nand Kishore – Appellant
Versus
State Election Commissioner – Respondent


Table of Content
1. nomination and symbol allotment processes. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. claim of illegal symbol allotment. (Para 5 , 6)
3. election petition's necessity and maintainability. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
4. judicial restraint during elections. (Para 10 , 11)
5. writ petition dismissed for maintainability. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)

JUDGMENT

Vikas Mahajan, J. (Oral)--The petitioner is contesting as an independent candidate from Ward No.228 (Maujpur) in the ensuing MCD elections. The case of the petitioner is that after acceptance of his nomination papers, he chose his symbol `Torch' as his first preference and symbol `Camera' as his second preference. Another candidate i.e. respondent no.3, who is also contesting independently also chose the same symbol `Torch'.

2. The Returning Officer to resolve the issue had tried mediation and conciliation by calling both the candidates, but since both the candidates were insisting for allotment of `Torch' as their symbol, the Returning Officer held a draw through coupon/chits, in which the petitioner was successful and accordingly he was allotted `Torch' as a symbol. According to the petitioner, the other candidate i.e. respondent no.3 did not

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top