DELHI HIGH COURT
VIKAS MAHAJAN
Nand Kishore – Appellant
Versus
State Election Commissioner – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nomination and symbol allotment processes. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. claim of illegal symbol allotment. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. election petition's necessity and maintainability. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. judicial restraint during elections. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. writ petition dismissed for maintainability. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
JUDGMENT
Vikas Mahajan, J. (Oral)--The petitioner is contesting as an independent candidate from Ward No.228 (Maujpur) in the ensuing MCD elections. The case of the petitioner is that after acceptance of his nomination papers, he chose his symbol `Torch' as his first preference and symbol `Camera' as his second preference. Another candidate i.e. respondent no.3, who is also contesting independently also chose the same symbol `Torch'.
2. The Returning Officer to resolve the issue had tried mediation and conciliation by calling both the candidates, but since both the candidates were insisting for allotment of `Torch' as their symbol, the Returning Officer held a draw through coupon/chits, in which the petitioner was successful and accordingly he was allotted `Torch' as a symbol. According to the petitioner, the other candidate i.e. respondent no.3 did not
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.