SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Narendra Nahata – Appellant
Versus
Shree Aggarsen North Ex Welfare Society (Regd.) – Respondent


Table of Content
1. exemption application for document filing. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments regarding election symbol allotment procedure. (Para 4 , 5)
3. historical practice of numbering symbols in past elections. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
4. contentions against undue interference in election process. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
5. concerns over procedural fairness in elections. (Para 13 , 15)
6. no formal rules for symbol allotment in society elections. (Para 16 , 17 , 18)
7. evasive response by returning officer to plaintiff's inquiries. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
8. reiteration of plaintiff's consistent concern over fairness. (Para 23 , 24 , 25)
9. court's jurisdiction on election process halting. (Para 26 , 27)
10. supreme court guidelines on election proceedings. (Para 28 , 29)
11. timing on granting judicial relief in elections. (Para 30 , 31 , 32)
12. need for a prima facie case for court intervention. (Para 33)
13. conclusion on dismissing application for interim stay. (Para 34 , 35)

JUDGMENT

Neena Bansal Krishna, J. (ORAL)

I.A. 7921/2022 (Under Section 151 of CPC seeking exemption from filing the certified copies and legible copies of the documents)

1.1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

1.2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top