DELHI HIGH COURT
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Narendra Nahata – Appellant
Versus
Shree Aggarsen North Ex Welfare Society (Regd.) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. exemption application for document filing. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding election symbol allotment procedure. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. historical practice of numbering symbols in past elections. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. contentions against undue interference in election process. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. concerns over procedural fairness in elections. (Para 13 , 15) |
| 6. no formal rules for symbol allotment in society elections. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 7. evasive response by returning officer to plaintiff's inquiries. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 8. reiteration of plaintiff's consistent concern over fairness. (Para 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 9. court's jurisdiction on election process halting. (Para 26 , 27) |
| 10. supreme court guidelines on election proceedings. (Para 28 , 29) |
| 11. timing on granting judicial relief in elections. (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 12. need for a prima facie case for court intervention. (Para 33) |
| 13. conclusion on dismissing application for interim stay. (Para 34 , 35) |
JUDGMENT
Neena Bansal Krishna, J. (ORAL)
I.A. 7921/2022 (Under Section 151 of CPC seeking exemption from filing the certified copies and legible copies of the documents)
1.1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
1.2
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.