SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
JYOTI SINGH
Ram Murti Bansal – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. mandamus for promotion. (Para 1)
2. delay and laches affect writ petitions. (Para 2 , 4 , 5)
3. awareness of non-promotion. (Para 3 , 7)
4. seniorities and established rights should not be disturbed. (Para 6)
5. discretionary nature of article 226 powers. (Para 8 , 9)
6. writ petition dismissed. (Para 10)

JUDGMENT

Jyoti Singh, J. (Oral)--Present writ petition has been filed seeking a writ of Mandamus to Respondent No. 2 to consider the Petitioner for promotion from E-4 to E-5 level w.e.f. 01.01.1999, along with all consequential benefits.

2. Preliminary objection has been raised on behalf of the Respondents to the maintainability of the writ petition on the ground that it is barred by delay and laches, as a period of nearly 21 years has elapsed from 1999, when allegedly the cause of action arose in favour of the Petitioner.

3. Petitioner was appointed as Administrative Officer (Vigilance) in ONGC on 19.02.1983 at E-1 level and was subsequently promoted on 01.01.1987, 01.01.1992 and 01.01.1996 to E-2, E-3 and E-4 levels, respectively. The grievance of the Petitioner is that he was entitled to promotion to the E-5 level w.e.f. 01.01.1999 and despite being eligible, e

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top